| Blackrock Spire | Wednesday, September 03, 2003 - 05:25 pm 
::looks at his countries:: Hmmm yup I play it and the idea would definitly make the player to player activity sky rocket in my opinion |
| Ollobrains | Thursday, September 04, 2003 - 04:17 am
The player to player activity are the w3 trying to promote that or is computer AI involvement still a very important factor. The idea has some defenite advantages. |
| Zodiac Taurus | Thursday, September 04, 2003 - 05:33 am
My "Warcraft" reference was certainly in jest. The Ollobrains suggestion that random events have a significant role in gameplay is realistic indeed, but unfortunately not likely in this sim(as are so many worthy suggestions). I would definitely support such a change and I appreciate any such ideas that are posted here. One should also not underestimate the fed contributions to these suggestions in any event. |
| Ollobrains | Thursday, September 04, 2003 - 08:14 am
random events would make the game more unpredicatable and more strategies would have to be devised which is what the programmers of simcountry want. Both economic and military would be good.
The fed contributions are most welcome, and they certainly do respond to our posts ie the recent clarifcation over the war index and easier use of navy postioning are examples as was my push for visa card and mastercard payments to allow more players to join GB. |
