| Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 08:48 pm |
No. I meant your two cents are unimportant.
You see, If you would have posted in a different manner, it would have been a different scenerio. But since you decided to include 'bitch' and the assumption that you have a say or the right to know our federation affairs, I was inclined and (may I say) eager to respond in a nasty nasty way.
| Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 08:50 pm |
At least Faith apologized for a honest mistake, even if our responses were a little harsh. But who can blame when the subject is fresh and quite delicate.
| Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 11:29 pm |
Well again any accusatory errors on faiths part are as much the monkies fault (more so) as faiths. When you failed to clearly communicate your goals in this matter you forfeited the right to bitch about any mistaken impressions that somebody might arrive at.
Complete bullshit. We owe nothing to you. Especially not our plans regarding our own federation's countries.
Our federation's one attempt at opening discussion like this was soundly rejected, so don't let me ever hear you or anyone else crying about the consequences of that again.
Faith has no excuse for asking his question the way he did, and in the forum he did. He knows it, so what's your problem James Folsom?
| Wednesday, October 22, 2003 - 11:37 pm |
If our 2 cents are soooooooooo unimportant, why did any of you bother to respond in the first place?
Because this was posted in a public forum, and while we've learned over the past couple month to not give a shit what you think, there is bound to be someone who reads this thread that we want to have an accurate understanding of the situation.
| Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 02:20 am |
Your proposal for increased communication was obviously not acceptable to many, I wouldn't know, I tried to participate in that.
Quite frankly you just weren't getting your way, and so you got mad and took your toys, and went home. There were many ways that it could have been made to work, you just weren't interested in any way that wasn't your way.
| Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 07:06 am |
| Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 07:38 am |
Once again you're talking out of your ass, and quite frankly it's become downright annoying.
Your proposal for increased communication was obviously not acceptable to many
Complete bullshit. We wanted the Council to be a forum for communication. You wanted to set universal and biased war rules with it before you'd even consider the communication part.
some basic ground rules will have to be laid out before anyone will agree to particapate.
-hymy on the "Golden Council" thread
So who set the ultimatum? Who took their toys and went home?
4 Monkey members posted on that thread, 2 of whom were actively throwing ideas around and trying to get the idea to work. How many non-monkey members were doing that? None. Scorpion said "I agree with all the points presented. With GR in complete chaos with all the rule changes and the transfers, a new forum is needed.", Fully posted some UNSC history on it, and you wanted something other than communication. That was it. Which is absolutely fine, but very annoying when after all that you cry that we didn't tell you what we were doing with our own countries.
| Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 07:43 am |
I cannot believe you guys, using Cirian death to spark a dispute. Faith asked a question which may or may not have been best addressed on these forums and Grey responded quite harshly and incongruously. It should have ended there but others then came in and turned it into a heated discussion.
I ask both sides as a show of respect to Cirian please stop the bickering on this issue.
Thankyou in Advance.
| Thursday, October 23, 2003 - 07:55 am |
There's your line hymyland. Grab it. Pretend that this in some way has something to do with Cirian and take the "moral high ground", walking away without addressing your inconsistencies.
Or if you truly believe that this does have something to do with Cirian, then post a new thread and you can answer up on that one.