|Previous Thread:||Everyone post a brief history|
|Next Thread:||?? don't understand this weird education index -- any ideas?|
| Monday, October 27, 2003 - 10:01 am |
I've been sitting here for an hour trying to take this country. I click four times, then I watch television for 5 minutes, then I click four more times. It's boring and I want to go to bed.
Having slow war times may be beneficial for a defending nation, but it's extremely frustrating taking out hundreds of forts in an inactive country, or blowing up tons of towns in a c3.
So could we have a faster war rate, and then make it an option for either country to activate a slower war time? You win both ways.
Or we could just speed up war against c3's. And along those lines, have the 4-month wait for ceos to get authorization to build in c3's abolished. Along with the 4-month wait for war with a c3. They seem pointless.
Please w3c. I'd have more time to feed my starving orphaned siblings. The world would be a better place.
| Tuesday, October 28, 2003 - 12:02 am |
Agreed. The war rate limits are pointless against C3s, as I have yet to see one of them retaliate - although that is a different issue entirely.
| Tuesday, October 28, 2003 - 04:53 am |
I mean if they're trying to make it harder to conquer C3s why would they possibly make this change...!? It gives them time to repair & it stops you megalomaniacs from being able to keep on destroying the world...
| Tuesday, October 28, 2003 - 06:37 am |
Illusion, your post doesn't make any sense. Try again.
| Tuesday, October 28, 2003 - 10:53 am |
War taking so long between attacks isn't stopping anyone Illusion. It doesn't make conquest itself more difficult, and countries can't repair within the same month that they're attacked. You've played the game longer than I have man. You know these things. You just need to post something contrary to anything I, Missouri, or anyone in my federation say on these boards no matter how helpful or valid their points are.