Simcountry Home   Simcountry Documentation   Simcountry Documentation   Simcountry Terminology
online games, multiplayer games
spacing
bullet Simcountry is an Online Digital World where you are the President of a country.
spacing
bullet No download needed!
spacing
What is Simcountry?
Beginners Info
What is Simcountry?
| | | | |
Previous Thread: Oceania needs high tech engineers (White Giant)
Next Thread: Country for Sale on Golden Rainbow (Golden Rainbow)

RESOLUTION PASSED BY SEC COUNCIL MEMBER WHO REFUSES TO REMOVE AN OFF AIR BASE IN MY COUNTRY (Little Upsilon)

Simcountry: Simcountry Bulletin Board  RESOLUTION PASSED BY SEC COUNCIL MEMBER WHO REFUSES TO REMOVE AN OFF AIR BASE IN MY COUNTRY (Little Upsilon)

AK47 (Little Upsilon)

Wednesday, August 24, 2011 - 09:05 pm Click here to edit this post
* Nuclear Attacks forbidden for B2 Resolution accepted on Sep 7 2833 and effective until Mar 7 2841 details
* The Council decides, there is no voting round by the other presidents.

AK47 (Little Upsilon)

Wednesday, August 24, 2011 - 09:06 pm Click here to edit this post
A BUNCH OF THIEVES AND LIARS

CorporatePartner (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 03:09 am Click here to edit this post
Already discussed the Security Council Resolution, proposed by "nix001", with "AK47" in Simcountry Cafe' live chat box.

Supposedly, the issue was centered around a "left-over" Rapid Deployment Unit/Offensive Military Airport/Depot, which was confused as some kind of "offensive/attack". "nix001", who is on the Little Upsilon Security Council, supposedly was accused of attacking, and was threatened to be attacked...so, he proposed a Resolution, and probably voted for it himself, and it passed 1-0, to Forbid Nuclear Attacks from only one country controled by "AK47". The details are on the Resolutions page.

However, that dispute was supposedly totally resolved, and was understood to be a mis-understanding, and both parties agreed to let it go. As of about 3 Little Upsilon months ago, this issue was accepted as a kind of "left over" Resolution, and as there is currently no option to 'cancel' such a Resolution, basically it was left at that. "AK47" basically agreed with and was agreeable to "letting water go under the bridge" with what transpired.

So, up until very recently, that is the only vote or action that the Little Upsilon Security Council had taken. In fact of 15 members, just one voted, and didn't even see that vote here, so didn't vote either. A discussion was started to offer to propose some kind of counter-Resolution, like Enforce a Peace Treaty, between "AK47" and "nix001", but it was apparently, more than resolved already.

The fact that the former Resolution by "nix001" and the current war with "AK47" happen to over-lap, may or may not be related, really have no idea and really there's not much that could be done without some kind of evidence/justification to link the two things together. The Resolution by "nix001" was proposed and accepted about 5 Little Upsilon years ago.

Even then, if two or more parties chose to engage in "war", then it's not really clear why the Security Council should intervene at all, but there are 14 other members who can make an own judgment for themselves. From observing a bit of the discussion, and checking a few countries, and talking to a few involved, though, it seems like a kind of "normal war", though, obviously, the Security Council could intervene, again, if there were some justification, and if some members desired to do so. For here, though, until some specific reason were given as to why it would be justified to "intervene", no Resolution would be proposed or supported. There are many examples of other leaders conducting "war", for not much else than "raiding", even those considered to be "peace", "econ", "neutral", "like Switzerland", or similar, and usually the Security Council is completely absent from such activity.

Any reference to a "corrupt Security Council" or "an allied Security Council" is likely nothing more than something equivalent to "war chants"(probably mostly hyperbole and banter, rather than serious need or discussion).

Maybe some other Security Council members, both past and present, and those who have called for, lobbied against, or been involved in such Resolutions could give an opinion as well. It would be nice to see "nix001" clarify what exactly happened with the original Resolution as well, though an extensive description of the original issue was detailed as part of the original proposal.

Until there is something actually happening, or an actual tangible issue to debate, this issue is basically tabled.

CorporatePartner (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 02:18 pm Click here to edit this post
Here is a fairly modest "counter-Resolution" in order to compensate somewhat for the former Resolution which really should no longer be in effect.

Security Council Home

view all proposals

Peace Treaty enforced between B2 and The Empire of Sheroni.
The countries can't start war between them if the resolution is accepted.
The Resolution was a proposal by CorporatePartner with the following motivation:
B2 was restricted to not using Nuclear Weapons due to a proposal by member nix001, that was apparently for an issue which was already resolved. That Resolution should really no longer be in effect, and should not hamper or restrict the one country B2 from engaging fully in its current war. This proposal calls for an enforced Peace Treaty between the two pricipal leaders, for only, the one country B2 controled currently by AK47 and The Empire of Sheroni currently controled by supersoldierrcp. There are other nations involved in the war but those are the prnicipal two which are likely affected most by the former Resolution.
The Security Council is currently voting about this proposal. The council will make a decision before 25 Aug 2838

1 council member voted for the proposal and 0 council members voted against it.
You are a member of the Security Council and voted for the proposal.

CorporatePartner (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 02:34 pm Click here to edit this post
To: "The Empire of Sheroni" and "B2", and open letter to Simcountry forum

Re: Peace Treaty proposal and agreement

A Security Council Proposal was made and posted to the forum to enforce a Peace Treaty between B2 and The Empire of Sheroni.

B2 was restricted from Nuclear Attacks due to another Resolution which shouldn't be in effect still as that dispute was apparently resolved already. If further hostilities for a period of several world years (whatever the Resolution specifies) could be avoided between these two countries, it would be appreciated. The Resolution, even if passed, wouldn't really change much, so it's more of an informal agreement given the circumstances. Other countries would be un-affected.

This message is being sent to both The Empire of Sheroni and B2, and posted to the forum. Thank you. CorporatePartner

Crafty (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 02:49 pm Click here to edit this post
What? Sheroni hasn't won yet? >.<

AK47 (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 03:38 pm Click here to edit this post
They won because they effectively crippled my defence. I was fighting 3 fed members plus the security council. CEO MAFIA CONTROL THIS GAME

Crafty (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 04:38 pm Click here to edit this post
AK47, learn from it dude. All us vets have lost wars (well, except me, lol) and now you are more experienced than 75% of people here. You'll do ok, just keep cool and learn from your mistakes.

AK47 (Little Upsilon)

Thursday, August 25, 2011 - 06:49 pm Click here to edit this post
They won because they effectively crippled my defence. I was fighting 3 fed members plus the security council. CEO MAFIA CONTROL THIS GAME

THE THEORETICAL

DIRE DIRECT EVIDENCE

Wednesday, August 24, 2011 - 09:05 pm Click here to edit this post * Nuclear Attacks forbidden for B2 Resolution accepted on Sep 7 2833 and effective until Mar 7 2841 details
* The Council decides, there is no voting round by the other presidents.


AN ACTION OF PROTECTION, HOWEVER,

THE MAXIM : EVIL GOES UNREWARDED, IS A FUNDAMENTAL TENET OF WESTERN PHILOSOPHY.

HALF THE SECURITY COUNCIL ARE ALEDGED TO CONSPIRE

Simcountry Introduction