|
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Previous document: | No more unannounced, latemonth corrections |
Next document: | inactive CEO corps |
More documents: | How to Play Simcountry |
Detailed Description:
This is either a really good idea or a really stupid idea. I know W3C won't create a new world until there is a demand for one due to lots of players. How about a new world being created though in which wars against human players is not an option, basically a peaceful world, the opposite of Fearless Blue. Of course we should still be able to attack C3's to build an empire. Just not able to attack one another. Before you dismiss this idea as foolish, think about this - it would actually add and keep more players to Simcountry. The people that are pacifists or don't have time in their schedules to worry about fighting lengthy wars would be attracted by this. It would still have all the dynamics of our other worlds because there would still be a need for a military in order to conquer C3's. It could even double as a 'tutorial' world which has been suggested before. Players that are typically scared off or discouraged and leave the game may stay due to being able to become comfortable in the peaceful world. Once they get better acquainted with the game, I'm sure they'd stay and venture into other worlds - making the game owners more money. Think about it, we have a 'hostile' world - FB, why not have a peaceful world too. Heck, if such a world was added maybe we could remove the secured mode aspect of the other worlds that so many loathe. I think this is a great idea. Priest
20 gamers voted for the proposal.
11 gamers voted against the proposal.
The proposal has been ACCEPTED.
W3Creative reaction:
We agree and it is indeed a very good idea. The rwason we do not add worlds just now is that each world requires a large dedicated server with all the backup and disaster ready facilities and the maintenance etc.
We see more players now than before and if this will indeed continue, we will set this up.